B
Bikenut
Guest
When it comes to private property rights the property owner's right to control his property means he can make not exercising a right a condition of being allowed onto/into his property.don't understand what your statement means to my post. but to let you know you are wrong. the constitution also applies to the states and to individuals. you just have to separate the rights of the individuals. there are cases where individuals have been charged and i believe found guilty of violating others constitutional rights
The simple example is a "no guns" rule... which means the property owner is saying that in order to have permission to be on/in his property people must not exercise the right to bear arms. And it means that those who decide to accept his permission that comes with the "open to the public" invitation voluntarily agree to abide by that rule.
It also means that those who think the 2nd Amendment means the private property owner (an individual) cannot restrict their right to carry a gun and go onto/into a property that has a no guns rule while carrying a gun anyway will find themselves booted right on out of that property...if the owner/his representative catches them anyway. They may even be arrested for trespass if they don't leave when told to.
Which means... while the 2nd Amendment binds the government it does not bind the private individual.
If the 2nd Amendment was binding on an individual then no property owner would be able to have a "no guns" rule and they certainly wouldn't be able to throw anyone out who carried a gun onto/into their property.
However.... since this thread is about listing open carry experiences and discussing private property rights is a bit off topic may I suggest starting a separate discussion if you wish to pursue this further.
On topic... I didn't go anywhere today... in fact I didn't even get out of my robe all day. Which means while I did CC all day I didn't OC at all.
Last edited by a moderator: