I finished it today - not bad! Thanks again. Good presenter, actually one of the most polite and calm shows I've seen in years. I'd already read most of the news items covered when they broke, but it was a nice change of pace.
Probably "Civil Unrest" would be a more accurate term for this level of intensity in a conflict. But I'm sure that if you're the one who gets beaten, bones broken, business burned down, shot, peppered, or otherwise attacked by radical violent (mostly Left Wing instigated) groups, "unrest" might seem too weak a word. He's not actually telling the worst of it. But it may be getting better. I think we're actually safer on the street and less likely to have widespread conflicts or possibility of war today than we were during the past few years. When police were getting killed, and various citizens getting killed or seriously injured but not reported on national news - only local, that was a serious time.
I bookmarked the show channel and will probably watch again at some point to see what else he covers. I don't agree with every word, but certainly agree with most of the main points, including the Criminal Immigration Fake "Family Separation" Scam and the real dangers of inciting socialist conflicts (class, race, gender, proclivities and whatever other scams they come up with) in our society. Agree about the ridiculous anti-Israel UN focus. I love Israel, but among all the good I also believe that many churches give Israel(ites) a complete pass for some specific detrimental actions without even noticing. If you really respect someone, respect the real someone.
I was completely comfortable with the Christian, moral, patriotic, and traditional aspects of the show, and couldn't care less whether any anti-gun, anti-speech, anti-liberty sources such as NPR, NYT, or SPLC thinks that is acceptable.