• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

How long does it take to get a pistol permit in CT

Ptrowski

New member
Joined
Dec 6, 2012
Messages
8
Location
Connecticut
Fingerprints are required by law to be sent to SPBI within 5 days of application.

So Putnam PD called back and said that the officer who took our prints supposedly never hit send. It was a new system to them so it was an error. Not sure what I actually believe but will confirm with SPBI they are there tomorrow.
 

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
So Putnam PD called back and said that the officer who took our prints supposedly never hit send. It was a new system to them so it was an error. Not sure what I actually believe but will confirm with SPBI they are there tomorrow.

The PDs almost always lie about these issues. Never take them at their word.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
So Putnam PD called back and said that the officer who took our prints supposedly never hit send. It was a new system to them so it was an error. Not sure what I actually believe but will confirm with SPBI they are there tomorrow.

So have they fired the guy yet?
 

toni69x

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
20
Location
CT
Hello guys new here

I've read multiple comments on here on how long permits are usually taking and I feel like I'm gonna be waiting for a long long time. Filed mine in Waterbury on 07/22/2014 just hope it doesn't take 6 months like I was told.
 

Ptrowski

New member
Joined
Dec 6, 2012
Messages
8
Location
Connecticut
So what?! Its an "isolated incident". Nothing here to see or talk about, just move on. Public employees are exempt from any responsibility. No need for training or discipline. Sooner or later they will get it right. :rolleyes:

Well luckily I was working from home yesterday as I received a call from the town. Our temp permits should be available to pick up this afternoon.
 

spt_1955

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
8
Location
Hanover, MA
What about Time on Non-Resident permits??

Does anybody have current information on non-resident processing times? I cannot visit a local PD to ask and while some people are referring to "checks cashed" I was required to send money orders/Cashier checks not personal checks.
 

spt_1955

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
8
Location
Hanover, MA
In 2013 it took me 4 months be patient if you are clean you will get it.

Thanks tiedie. Finally got somebody on Northeast Shooters forum to respond with actual experience and their timeframe agrees with yours. They applied in early Feb 2014 and got it last week in May.

Now if I can just find somebody who ACTUALLY got a non-resident in Rhode Island.
 

toni69x

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
20
Location
CT
Called a few minutes ago

I just spoke with Louise a few minutes ago and she told me that everything was sent back to WPD on August 11th. I submitted my application July 22nd. The 8 week deadline is in a week and I'm planning on filing an appeal, which I will send after I speak with someone from my local PD this week.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
I just spoke with Louise a few minutes ago and she told me that everything was sent back to WPD on August 11th. I submitted my application July 22nd. The 8 week deadline is in a week and I'm planning on filing an appeal, which I will send after I speak with someone from my local PD this week.

Well if you do file an appeal to the BFPE they will send you a questionnaire. I objected to all queries on the questionnaire and received this response from the board in respect to what MUST be completed, the other questions are optional. I completed the only required questions and the case moved forward.

Any ? about this ..pm me.
 

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
Well if you do file an appeal to the BFPE they will send you a questionnaire. I objected to all queries on the questionnaire and received this response from the board in respect to what MUST be completed, the other questions are optional. I completed the only required questions and the case moved forward.

Any ? about this ..pm me.

Here is the result of this advice:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thc0M_ZdK80

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke7Uhu_ZUSM

Take advice from this poster at your own risk.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Here is the result of this advice:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thc0M_ZdK80

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke7Uhu_ZUSM

Take advice from this poster at your own risk.

Are you saying that all the questions on the questionnaire MUST be answered?

That was my post. You may argue that the post is wrong if you wish but you did not say that what I said was wrong.

Instead, a person who says for people to not register their assault weapons while also stating that he has none to register, post something not relevant.

So consider the last poster's underlining purpose....its drivel...and does not address the actual post.

Another good job by Rich. I thought you were not posting to this forum anymore...or maybe Ed who keeps on posting..I get confused as your posts are usually confusing.
 

Rich B

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2009
Messages
2,909
Location
North Branford, Connecticut, USA
I remember these from 2 years ago. They haven't gotten any better with age. It is painful to listen to and it would be funny if not so pitiful.

Amazing recordings aren't they? Not as spectacular as the meltdown he has when you post them as fair warning to people he is giving poor legal advice to. He even goes out of his way to lie about organizations and people that have spent their time helping people he has given bad information to. But no one will debate him anymore because he can never cite a source for anything.

Usually we fight apathy, but there are outliers like these where we actually end up with people going out of their way to hurt people and the cause. Go figure.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Amazing recordings aren't they? Not as spectacular as the meltdown he has when you post them as fair warning to people he is giving poor legal advice to. He even goes out of his way to lie about organizations and people that have spent their time helping people he has given bad information to. But no one will debate him anymore because he can never cite a source for anything.

Usually we fight apathy, but there are outliers like these where we actually end up with people going out of their way to hurt people and the cause. Go figure.

You are like to BFPE .. calling someone a liar w/o saying what he lied about. Guess what? I lied to my cat today...so I guess I am a liar.

I only gave the guy 1 bit of advice, and accurate advice I should say. People don't want to provide the gov't w/information that they don't need.

A source? I posted the BFPE secretary's letter. Why don't you go out and beat up on little girls ... you are not winning here.
 

toni69x

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Messages
20
Location
CT
Great information

Well if you do file an appeal to the BFPE they will send you a questionnaire. I objected to all queries on the questionnaire and received this response from the board in respect to what MUST be completed, the other questions are optional. I completed the only required questions and the case moved forward.

Any ? about this ..pm me.

I just want my application to move forward and I've noticed how question 8 asks about employer. How would I answer that if I'm a full time student and I just help my father in construction? Basically I'm not employed by him. Also, It's still a bit unclear to me on which questions I must answer If I'm just submitting the appeal letter due to the 8 week delay.
 
Last edited:

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
I noticed how question 8 asks about employer. How would I answer that if I'm a full time student and I just help my father in construction? Basically I'm not employed by him. Also, It's still a bit unclear to me on which questions I must answer If I'm just submitting the appeal letter due to the 8 week delay.

Its none of their business about your employer or lack thereof. You can simply object to the question.

Why? Because....

CGS 4-178, Chapter 54 states “…In contested cases: (1) Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency shall, as a matter of policy, provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence…”


Section 29-32b-7. Acknowledgement

After receipt of the appeal the Secretary reserves the right to make a thorough inquiry of the facts of the appeal. When the Secretary determines that the information obtained relative to the appeal is sufficient to permit the conduct of a fair and impartial hearing, he shall set a date for a hearing and give reasonable notice of the time and place of the hearing to the appellant and to the issuing authority.
(Effective May 1, 1975)


And specifically in respect to the employer query, you can list the same reason as I did:

And the inquiry as to the complainant’s employer information is clearly disturbing to the complainant. Now, the Board is asking for information that could result in the complainant losing employment and a means of providing for himself and his family by asking for the complainant’s employer (Questionnaire inquiry number 9). There would be nothing to stop ANYONE from calling my employer or future employers and telling them I own a firearm and there would be no relief to the complainant if the employer wishes to terminate the employment of the complainant. Many employers are anti-gun and have anti-gun policies. Plus, if they kept on an employee whom they know owns a gun then it may leave the employer open to possible civil suits and this creates a great incentive to terminate such employees, even with pro-gun employers.



That's why the secretary of the BFPE did not mandate that the employer question be answered. Its an irrelevant question and immaterial to the subject matter.

Remember...the board looks closely at their stupid questions and answers...if you make a simple mistake they will just call you a liar and deny you a permit that should be issued; hence, its best not to provide any information if you can help it.

And are you required to continually update your answers if your responses would change? Like in 2 yrs (the time you might get a hearing) ? And if you don't? They may use it to disqualify you. I don't trust these guys at all...they are not your friend.
 
Last edited:

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
Also, It's still a bit unclear to me on which questions I must answer <snip>.

see post #255 of this thread for questions that must be answered ... ie at least what they ruled on before


A simple objection letter sent with the form (and just noting objection on the response line) was all I sent...they cannot ask irrelevant or immaterial questions...

Worst that can happen is that they say you must answer the question ... and you can either a) still not answer and get a dismissal that would be able to be appealed or b) provide the responses (as I did after they ruled on the objections, many in my favor ~ I only answered the questions that the secretary demanded that I answer -- stuff like motor vehicle history was gone, etc as noted in post #255 of this thread).

I had other issues with the board and their authority to ask questions during the hearing (the law does not allow them to ask witnesses questions) ~ they had a fit when I objected to their asking questions. And one can refuse to answer questions in this venue...one is not required to respond and no reason is needed, the law allows one to simply refuse w/o giving a reason. I have not seen anyone else object to their being able to ask witnesses questions -- but they clearly are not authorized by the law to ask witnesses questions, and the board is a creature of statue-they cannot do anything that the legislature does not authorize them to do and I see no statue or regulation that allows them to interrogate witnesses during the hearing (before the hearing, yes, but not during).

I'm surprised no one has filed a writ of mandamus after waiting 6 months after filing the appeal either after demanding a hearing to the board.. as one must practice with their gun every 6 mos. to maintain proficiency (per US Army and clearly 2 yrs is outrageous) and we have the right to practice ,,, and one needs a permit to transport a handgun to a range, per the law (and that's the board's opinion as well as noted in some of their memorandums on cases).
 
Last edited:
Top