• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Who needs a gun in Boston?

AbNo

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,805
Location
Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
imported post

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma...03/citys_police_sharpen_their_watch_on_crime/

As part of a new crime-fighting initiative unveiled yesterday, Boston police now have the ability to witness shootings, robberies, and even homicides on many city streets from computer screens at headquarters...
Oh goodie! Now if I go back to Boston, someone can WATCH me get mugged and/or killed, as opposed to dying where no one can see me.

That makes me feel.... safe. :uhoh:

Extra points if you can show me where in this article it explicitly says the system is designed to PREVENT crime.

Yes, I'm feeling curmudgeonly today. Why do you ask?
 

mrsemman

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
34
Location
West Brookfield, Massachusetts, USA
imported post

Crime prevention is not a technical systems responsibility. It is everyone's responsibility. There are very few times, that criminals stick around for the police to show up and then initiate the criminal act. When criminals realize that this system can monitor their activity, they will either move to another area, or realize the futility and give up the activity.

In the MA town that I worked, the police also operated the Ambulance Service. One early morning, while we were enroute to the hospital with a heart attack patient, with everyone except the dispatcher inside the ambulance, we drove past a jewelry store that was being broken into.

Cops cannot be everywhere. But, how do explain the down turn of violent crime in cities?
 

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
imported post

mrsemman wrote:
Crime prevention is not a technical systems responsibility. It is everyone's responsibility. There are very few times, that criminals stick around for the police to show up and then initiate the criminal act. When criminals realize that this system can monitor their activity, they will either move to another area, or realize the futility and give up the activity.

In the MA town that I worked, the police also operated the Ambulance Service. One early morning, while we were enroute to the hospital with a heart attack patient, with everyone except the dispatcher inside the ambulance, we drove past a jewelry store that was being broken into.

Cops cannot be everywhere. But, how do explain the down turn of violent crime in cities?

Commensurate with the upturn of both concealed and open carry, as well as the change in gun laws over the years which far better support carry of all types now than they did in the 1980s?

Just a gues... :celebrate
 

ABNinfantryman

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
204
Location
Columbus, Georgia, United States
imported post

Nope still going with the video games. There's more that coincides with the rise in popularity of video games and the decline in violent crime than there is for OC and CC being a deterrant. It's been argued that those who would be prone to commiting such crimes are getting their "fix" per se from violent video games. I'd get the data, but I keep getting "Policy Block: Video Games This action has been logged" messages. Stupid network. :X
 
Top