Lots of assumptions
Considering the remarks made BEFORE the gun grab, the officer is an idiot if he was not paying attention.
IF he heard them, sure. Did he?
Not only is he a bigot, but a moron, I personally would push for the firing of either bigots, or morons wearing a badge.
If he heard the comments and failed to pay attention, then you've got a case for moron.
I'm not sure I heard a case for bigotry. That is a pretty ugly jump to make over some a personal suggestion on not OCing, or changing one's hair or dress style to attract less attention. It clearly wasn't made under color of law as described by Drake, but was a personal opinion expressed in parting.
Drake has the right to dress as he sees fit. And a woman has a right to wear a short, tight miniskirt and stiletto heals while walking down dark allies in shady parts of town at 2:00 am. Once the light changes, a pedestrian has every legal right-of-way to step into the crosswalk regardless of how fast the bus is approaching the intersection or how icy the roads.
But unfortunate consequences are entirely foreseeable in the latter two cases even by those without a bigoted bone anywhere in their body.
If hair style/color, clothing style, or other fashion statements including visible tats or piercings or even an OC'd firearm are routinely generating unwanted attention, or attention that the recipient cannot deal with safely, then perhaps a change is advised for the same reasons we might advise pedestrians to be careful about stepping in front of speeding buses on icy roads, or young women to reconsider where and when they choose to walk alone. As my old driver's ed teacher used to tell us, "Being dead right isn't much of a consolation."
We don't have much choice over our height or skin color. Weight isn't going to change quickly. But how we dress and do our hair are very much within our control. When a person chooses fashion well outside the norms of the society in which he is living (As I do periodically when I wear one of my kilts and other Scottish attire), he ought not be surprised when that choice brings additional attention.
This is no excuse for assault or other criminal conduct, nor even for overtly rude or offensive behavior. But neither should we be blind to reality.
On a couple of occasions, I have been the target of un-invited sexual touching from women while I was wearing my kilt. In their minds, the women were just being friendly and flirtatious. But reverse the rolls and the instigator might well expect to get his face slapped at least. Admittedly, those dynamics are different than if the sexes are reversed given disparity in size and strength; and orders of magnitude less offensive and infinitely less dangerous than having a gun grabbed. But the simple fact remains that when I choose to wear my kilt I have to be prepared to properly deal with various interactions that are far less likely when I wear more common Saxon attire. From cat calls, to polite questions, to staring, to far more "flirtatious" behavior, how I look directly affects how others react to me.
If a person is utterly unprepared to maintain the SA needed to maintain positive control of a firearm, then OCing (and quite likely even CCing) is a bad idea. If a person cannot properly de-escalate the bigoted responses to his fashion statements, then maybe a change in fashion is worth considering.
There is a lot more to assuring that we go home safely each evening than just carrying a gun.
Charles
. 
