• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

The Most Amazing Coincidence!

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
We check the bejeebers out of 4473s. The selling associate checks the forms and signs it. A supervisory or managerial associate checks the form and signs it. Only then will we sell the firearm. It is checked again that night by a manager. It is checked the next day by the supervisor/manager taking the firearm out of the bound book. It is checked 2-3 more times by LP and managers.

I was checking a day’s forms to take them out of the bound book, when I noticed two forms with errors in customer entries. In such cases we sometimes have to ask the customer to come back and fix the entry. The two forms listed the same address for the purchaser. That’s not unusual. Roommates often come in together to buy firearms.

So I called the first individual. No answer. I left a message.

Then I called the second buyer. He answered. I explained the error, and he agreed to come in and fix it. I then asked him if his roommate were available. He stated he did not have a roommate. I asked, “You don’t have a roommate with a first name of __?” Nope. He lived alone. Uh oh.

In a later conversation with the first individual, we discussed the original error that prompted the call. Then I asked him to verify is current address. It became obvious that he did not live at the address he listed on the form. It turns out that he had not updated his driver’s license, and had previously lived at the address he listed on the form. He knew we would not have sold him the firearm had he not been able to produce acceptable identification with his current address, so he lied.

We could lose our FFL if we knew someone lied on the form 4473 and did not notify the ATF, so we notified them. I have no idea what the outcome was.

What are the odds that two people, one who currently lives at an address and one who formerly lived at that same address, would go to the same FFL on the same day to purchase firearms? Were it not for this coincidence no one would have ever noticed that the former resident had lied on the 4473.
 

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,315
Location
here nc
IAW CFR 27 478.124 Firearms transaction record.
C(2) In order to facilitate the transfer of a firearm and enable NICS to verify the identity of the person acquiring the firearm, ATF Form 4473 also requests certain optional information. This information includes the transferee's social security number. Such information may help avoid the possibility of the transferee being misidentified as a felon or other prohibited person.

(C3) After the transferee has executed the Form 4473, the licensee:

(i) Shall verify the identity of the transferee by examining the identification document (as defined in § 478.11) presented, and shall note on the Form 4473 the type of identification used;

IAW 27 CFR 478.11
Identification document. A document containing the name, residence address, date of birth, and photograph of the holder and which was made or issued by or under the authority of the United StatesGovernment, a State, political subdivision of a State, a foreign government, political subdivision of a foreign government, an international governmental or an international quasi- governmental organization which, when completed with information concerning a particular individual, is of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/478.11

Per ATF, Ohio Concealed weapons permits issued on or after March 23, 2015, qualifies as an alternative to the background check requirements. https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/permanent-brady-permit-chart

So eye95, did any ATF agents come back after you notified them of the documentation error and seize the 4473s or mandate immediate changes to the customer’s ATF form 4473 as well as ‘authorize’ the BX’s A/D book be appropriately changed?

If not...
 

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,315
Location
here nc
Two ATF forms 4473 had quote ; The two forms listed the same address for the purchaser. Unquote

Therefore the BX’s A/D book might/is in error!
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
It is stunning the hassles created by secondary laws—hassles usually only suffered only by the law-abiding.

Those who are willing to violate primary laws (rape, robbery, assault, murder, etc.) won’t give a rip about secondary laws.
 
Top