since9
Campaign Veteran
This morning's news carried headlines which skirted the edge of the law. While the television news agency did not reveal the specific address where the crimes and home defense shooting occurred, is as prohibited in many states, they did show video taken from across the street, and that video obviously and intentionally included the green street signs of the nearest intersection.
Two-thirds of all Americans know how to find that intersection on the Internet in about 15 seconds flat. Based on that information, a third of Americans know how to find the specific address of the house in less than a minute.
Ergo, by including the intersection, they provided all the information a bad guy out for vengeance needs in order to wreak havoc on the homeowner who was lawfully defending his or her domicile against armed criminals.
What do you think? Do you think it ought to be against the law for a news agency to reveal -- directly or indirectly -- the location of honest, law-abiding citizens who exercise their Second Amendment Rights defending life, limb, and property?
Is this legal in your state? Should it be?
Here's a sanitized screen shot of the news clip:
Two-thirds of all Americans know how to find that intersection on the Internet in about 15 seconds flat. Based on that information, a third of Americans know how to find the specific address of the house in less than a minute.
Ergo, by including the intersection, they provided all the information a bad guy out for vengeance needs in order to wreak havoc on the homeowner who was lawfully defending his or her domicile against armed criminals.
What do you think? Do you think it ought to be against the law for a news agency to reveal -- directly or indirectly -- the location of honest, law-abiding citizens who exercise their Second Amendment Rights defending life, limb, and property?
Is this legal in your state? Should it be?
Here's a sanitized screen shot of the news clip: