THE LAST CHANCE To Get National Concealed Carry Reciprocity Passed.

[Ghost1958]

To the subject at hand, federally forced National Reciprocity, there's no such animal. Anymore than the fed can do away with sanctuary cities, force speed limits or even driver licence recognition.

The states are constitutionally free to ignore and not enforce any Federal law they wish.
And in the case of NR several states will ignore it.

NJ. ILL, CA come to mind right off.

No fed LE are going to be running around say NJ arresting NJ cops for busting you because they don't recognize your permission slip.

Now. If you have the bucks to bail out of jail, fight your way thru every state level court and lose until you reach a sympathetic fed judge after 5 or 10 yrs you MIGHT prevail.

Let's stop drinking the NR kool-aid that allows infringements like fix NICS to be passed using a bait and switch like last time.

Plus the fed has no legitimate authority over firearms to begin with.

 

[since9]

So then I guess you're okay with government infringing on your rights, even though it's explicitly written in our founding documents that they can NOT do anything (2A).

In what universe did you arrive at that opinion? Not only do you not speak for me, you're putting words in my mouth. Again. And again, please knock it off.

Show me where in our founding documents the power is given to the almighty government to be the arbitrary decision maker on what YOU or I or ANYBODY else can put into our bodies if what we do does not impede the liberty of someone else?

Show me financial proof that the lowered income earning potential and increased medical, transportation, and similar behavioral risks do not impede the fiscal liberty of others via increased pooled insurance rates and taxes paying for welfare, medicare, medicaid, and raw medical expenses.

you don't have to like or agree with drug use- it certainly can and does destroy peoples' lives, but that's the same argument people make for infringing on gun rights: you're just changing the subject of the discourse.

Not at all. Unlike drug use, my exercising my Second Amendment rights comes from my own pocket and costs fellow law-abiding citizens absolutely zero increased expenses.