509rifas
Regular Member
I don't know if this has been mentioned here before but State V Casad is an unpublished opinion, meaning: it is not law. It's on the state info for WA and kinda insinuates that it is law, but it is not. Unpublished opinion is not law.
What it is is just exemplary. That is, that is how State V Spencer is interpreted, carrying a gun in public is not RAS. This can help you if you are carrying in public and you are stopped and you show the officer State V Casad because it is clearer than Spencer, but it in itself is not law, it wont help you in court unless the judge and prosecutor are idiots (which is definitely an option) but at appeals it's Spencer that rules. Casad is all according to the rules of Spencer, there is nothing new from it. Don't make any mistakes based on what Casad says.
What it is is just exemplary. That is, that is how State V Spencer is interpreted, carrying a gun in public is not RAS. This can help you if you are carrying in public and you are stopped and you show the officer State V Casad because it is clearer than Spencer, but it in itself is not law, it wont help you in court unless the judge and prosecutor are idiots (which is definitely an option) but at appeals it's Spencer that rules. Casad is all according to the rules of Spencer, there is nothing new from it. Don't make any mistakes based on what Casad says.