davidmcbeth
Banned
Surely Sony can up with some better ideas for film making?!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They have one called "The Application" in the works ... its a prequel to the "Interview"
Its gotta be better, right?
Surely Sony can up with some better ideas for film making?!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So then who shoots the missile into the helicopter?Watched the movie last night. It wasn't that bad and while the CIA might have wanted them to assassinate Kim, they don't do it. That is all that I'll say on the movie for risk of spoilers. So just because "the feds" might have wanted him assassinated (in the movie) doesn't mean that is what happens.
So then who shoots the missile into the helicopter?
So how does he catch fire and burn when the helicopter explodes?No one as the helicopter isn't destroyed by a missile. Besides that would have been self defense and not an assassination.
So how does he catch fire and burn when the helicopter explodes?
Wow.. This just got way too serious.You answered your own question. The helicopter explodes. You know, the helicopter that he is hanging out of the door of. As for how the helicopter explodes, it is hit by a projectile (that isn't a missile) in an act of self defense due to said helicopter firing on people.
Assassination:
1: to injure or destroy unexpectedly and treacherously
2: to murder (a usually prominent person) by sudden or secret attack often for political reasons
Neither of these reasons are why Kim was killed.
EDIT: As for how it explodes, that could be from a myriad of reasons. First off we're dealing with Hollywood, who loves to have things randomly explodes (especially vehicles). It could have been some type of exploding round (just because it explodes doesn't mean it is a missile). Other ordinance from the helicopter could have been ignited (cuz, Hollywood). Etc etc.
This is a great example of why folks should be armed to protect themselves.
Would these cowards dare attack a well armed populous?
I think not!
Wow.. This just got way too serious.
Sometimes the point I'd the joke is to not analyze every single word and apply then literally.It happens when words get used correctly.
YOU are the one to equate this cyber attack on a private company with government vulnerability
GET IT NOW?
Do not attack, especially personal attacks. Respond with facts and in keeping with OCDO rules and intent.--snipped--
Try to do some research before you attack half cocked please.
Do not attack, especially personal attacks. Respond with facts and in keeping with OCDO rules and intent.
The current dialog is not consistant with the OP and is definitely not fodder for "Open Carry issues that are hot at the moment" - might be better as a thread in the Social Lounge.
I can see where you could think that - it wasn't my intention though.Sorry, I thought I was asking nicely for the individual not to attack my post.
That was my intent.
Based on the time lapsed since you made your assertion, do you get it now?
Try to do some research before you attack half cocked please.