• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Sheriff's deputy mistakenly fires eight shots at robbery victim, misses

chewy352

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
769
Location
Harrah, Oklahoma
WEST HOLLYWOOD -- A sheriff's deputy fired eight shots at a man he believed to have just robbed a West Hollywood liquor store early Sunday, but his target turned out to be the just-robbed clerk, and the actual suspects got away.

The deputy-involved shooting occurred around 2 a.m. near Havenhurst Drive and Santa Monica Boulevard, said Deputy Lillian Peck of the Sheriff's Headquarters Bureau.

“Deputies responded to a robbery call of a liquor store in the 8200 block of Santa Monica Boulevard,'' Peck said. “The call indicated the suspects were armed with a handgun.''

Peck said one of the deputies “saw a man matching one of the suspects' description run from the area of the liquor store, holding what he believed to be a gun, and a deputy-involved shooting occurred.'' The man was not hit.

“The man was detained by deputies and was determined not to be a suspect,'' Peck said.

Lt. Alicia Ault told the WeHo News website a single deputy fired eight rounds at the man, who turned out to be the store clerk.

“The deputy fired eight rounds and missed him,'' Ault told WeHo News. “Ultimately, deputies determined that the man the deputy fired upon was the store's clerk who was pointing to them trying to get their attention.''

The two suspects were described only as a black man armed with a handgun and a black woman. Both suspects were last seen running southbound on Havenhurst Drive.

Windows at a store across the street from the robbery site were blown out by the gunfire.

http://www.laindependent.com/news/l...r-store-clerk-shooting-sheriff-104253944.html
 

chewy352

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
769
Location
Harrah, Oklahoma

suntzu

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2008
Messages
1,230
Location
The south land
and the deputy is still on the job why exactly? Anyone that trigger happy does not need to be near a gun.
 

ryanburbridge

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
299
Location
Long beach ca, , USA
I wish everyone in the "only cops are trained to carry guns" crowd would see this and burn it itno their minds!!!

This IS the point. We are asking a HUMAN to respond to a scene where DEATH is ready to strike. I am upset about what happend BUT it's OUR fault!!

The way I see it a civilian with a gun would have been a better solution. An armed civilian (A) would have been on scene to see the crime. (B) would have a much faster response time. (C) and statistically speaking would have had more gun training*. It is our job to protect and serve each other. And untill we change this reckless path back to that direction it will only get worse.

* please read GUN FACTS. Find it at google search gunfacts(dot)info
 

KS_to_CA

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
443
Location
National City, CA, ,
WEST HOLLYWOOD -- A sheriff's deputy fired eight shots at a man he believed to have just robbed a West Hollywood liquor store early Sunday, but his target turned out to be the just-robbed clerk, and the actual suspects got away.

Peck said one of the deputies “saw a man matching one of the suspects' description run from the area of the liquor store, holding what he believed to be a gun, and a deputy-involved shooting occurred.'' The man was not hit.



Translation: Cop saw something in the dark and started shooting. He missed 8 times. And this after hundreds of hours training.
 

Ca Patriot

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,330
Location
, ,
wouldnt it be nice if the general civilian population was held to the same standards as police ?

"Well officer, I saw a guy and he pointed his finger so I shot him"
 

bigtoe416

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jun 3, 2008
Messages
1,747
Location
Oregon
So many things wrong with this situation. Thanks for posting this chewy.
 

Gunslinger

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
3,853
Location
Free, Colorado, USA
"Hundreds of hours of training" doesn't stop a moron from being a moron. Only solution: stricter gun laws in the Workers Paradise of Kalifornia. Only well trained cops should have guns.
 
Last edited:

Gundude

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2009
Messages
1,691
Location
Sandy Eggo County
Fired 8 rds, and missed the clerk. Windows blown out across the street. This is most epic fail I ever heard of. This clown shouldn't have a gun or a badge.
 

Fuller Malarkey

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
1,020
Location
The Cadre
I'm waiting for the press release about this officer's "training".

"The Sheriff's Department, aware of the trigger happy tendencies of this particular officer, decided to chance his continuing employment based on his consistent inability to hit squat with his weapon".

I wonder what kind of glass claims the department has faced during this officer's career.
 

Ca Patriot

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
2,330
Location
, ,
Its my opinion that open carriers have more knowledge and experience with firearms and with shooting. I have seen too many videos of police doing e checks where they dont even know how to operate the handgun. This is a clear safety concern.
 

JoeSparky

Centurion
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,621
Location
Pleasant Grove, Utah, USA
I want to know if the ammo used in this situation was dept issued or did the deputy supply his own?

What brand/type? Price doesn't matter--- AS THE AMMO KNEW IMMEDIATELY THAT THE PERSON THE AMMO WAS SENT TOWARD WAS INNOCENT AND THEREFORE ALTERED THEIR TRAJECTORY TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT.

I think this is ammunition we should all have and want-- NO MATTER THE COST!


To all readers... the above is SARCASM!
 
Last edited:

Tomas

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
702
Location
University Place, Washington, USA
Hmmmmmm... This time the fact that most SoCal LEO seem as though they couldn't hit a barn if they were standing inside it was a good thing. The innocent escaped the LEO's armed assault unscathed.

This officer should NOT be an officer and should NOT be allowed to carry a firearm.
 

Gooelf

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
44
Location
California
Fired 8 rds, and missed the clerk. Windows blown out across the street. This is most epic fail I ever heard of. This clown shouldn't have a gun or a badge.

On a similar note I read (this happened years ago so I don't have a link) an article in the Sac Bee that Sacramento PD (most likely swat) raided a local house where shots were fired. They shot 22 rounds or more and struck the subject only three times. Now albeit this was a totally different situation, but would you trust your life to a single police officer in this area if multiple ones cannot hit the target?
 

Sons of Liberty

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
638
Location
Riverside, California, USA
wouldnt it be nice if the general civilian population was held to the same standards as police ?

"Well officer, I saw a guy and he pointed his finger so I shot him"

You can never tell whether or not the perp is pointing a loaded finger at you.

The old finger in the gun trick begins at 2:10

[video=youtube;1-nbQ7ifUkI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-nbQ7ifUkI[/video]

I use to have one of these Sixfinger guns:

sixfinger.jpg
 

We-the-People

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,221
Location
White City, Oregon, USA
Were I not trained and practiced, I would hazard a guess that the officer had his eyes closed. However, since he's had "100's of hours of training" he should have been able to at least get one round on target with his eyes closed. I know I can do 10 of 10 at 5 yards, 8 of 10 at 10 yards, and 5 of 10 at 15 yards into a doorway sized target (and not use the whole darn thing) WITH MY FREAKIN EYES CLOSED, while facing 90 degrees to the target, strong side towards the target.....draw point squeeze (repeat last step 10 times).

Usually this is demonstrated to people who seem to think you have to be facing the assailant in a weaver stance before you can return fire.

Now that I have my FN 5.7 I think I'll go try this with the 21 round capacity.....oh wait, it's deer season.....no recreational shooting on my range until I bag mine.......they're both (range and deer) in my back yard.
 

cato

Newbie
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
2,338
Location
California, USA
Really Mr. Uyeda? Really? I really don't believe cops go through hundreds of hours of firearms training in an entire lifetime.

80 hours academy, then maybe 8 hrs training/qualification time* every quarter on paper. How much of that is 'on task' is debatable. Very little to none is practical high stress combat style training.

Some barely qualify, most are mediocre...:( Some of us like shooting and do seek training out side of work.

*varies based on dept. policy & budget issues
 
Last edited:

Wc

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
329
Location
, ,
Maybe

80 hours academy, then maybe 8 hrs training/qualification time* every quarter on paper. How much of that is 'on task' is debatable. Very little to none is practical high stress combat style training.

Some barely qualify, most are mediocre...:( Some of us like shooting and do seek training out side of work.

*varies based on dept. policy & budget issues

Maybe they're using the gun video simulators! LOL
 
Top