Thoreau
Regular Member
imported post
kwikrnu wrote:
kwikrnu wrote:
Forest Service land has always applied state law as far as I've ever seen. (Speaking from an AZ perspective only, as I'm not familiar with anything outside of AZ when it comes to FS land.) I've carried consistently on numerous hikes/backpacking trips on FS land. Their website has always supported that, and half of those hikes have been with a FS ranger in my group =)NavyLT wrote:From what I've read tonight I think national recreation areas can be national parks (us department of the interior) or us forest service (us department of agriculture). I'm guessing that the us forest service national recreation areas must be off limits because they aren't mentioned in the act. I don't understand why the second amendment wouldn't apply equally to property of both departments.Ahh, well, if a National Recreation Area is a unit of the National Park System, then it would seem that the firearms prohibition in a National Recreation Area is, ummm, prohibited. I misread the statute myself, I missed the "unit of" part!