utbagpiper
Banned
As all here are well aware, they are done only and exclusively in response to your intended insulting form of address toward me. Address me with minimum respect as to avoid a term you know I find offensive and the civility will be returned. Continue to act like a puerile brat and you have no claim on decorum beyond what the mods enforce as forum rules.
Actually, it is I who must apologize for missing the obvious connection. Your years of non-linear, sanctimonious, stream of consciousness posts now all make sense. How could I have missed it.
Let me see if I can summarize for clarity.
White, religiously orientated individuals passed racist jim crow laws so anything white, religiously orientated individuals do is suspect.
What the crap were those self-serving white, religiously orientated individuals doing when they seceded from England? Or when they adopted the Bill of Rights protecting our religious freedom and RKBA? They clearly had suspect motives as they waged war and passed the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to abolish slavery and assure civil rights for all.
It is a good thing you took your critical view of white, religiously orientated individuals (and really, mostly men; not many women in these evil groups were there?) rather than toward middle eastern men not motivated by religion when they fly airplanes into buildings or commit other acts of terrorism. Similarly that you don't paint with similar broad brushes when large groups of black men riot and burn down cities, or when groups of black young men or young women engage in horrific violent crimes. Or even when groups of communist atheists commit genocide on such a scale as to make WWII Germany look like rank pikers. Anyone who painted with broad brushes in these cases would be rounding criticized as the worst of small minded bigots. You were savvy enough to keep your ugly stereotypes confined to "White, religiously orientated individuals. That is truly very brave my faux aussie friend.
Moving on, it appears that you approve of the civil disobedience of the Civil Rights movement. So, violating both statute and the private property rights of small businesses in the 1960s was a good thing to you because it helped bring about the end of racial segregation and other legalized discrimination.
But, my obeying all applicable laws while quietly ignoring a discriminatory and unenforced policy at a multi-billion dollar, nation-wide corporation rubs you the wrong way because.....why exactly?
Respecting the private property rights of multi-billion dollar, nation-wide corporations is an essential trait for you, but a law providing protections for the private property rights of any church that wishes to avail itself of that law is very offensive to you because....why exactly?
You have long exhibited the kind of irrational, contradictory views that remind us why "small minded" goes so naturally with "bigot." You greatly value private property rights (except when you don't), and presumably the 2nd amendment (though you rarely post much in actual support of individual RKBA), but are overtly hostile to 1st amendment freedom of religion. Your posts also frequently demonstrate a desire to "challenge" others, to demonstrate your superiority, and to belittle any who disagree with your enlightened view. It appears that you suffer from either extreme bigotry and hatred, or from some other from of equally debilitating mental defect. I'm not saying you do so suffer. Only that your behavior lends the appearance of such suffering.
Here is a tip. I live my life as I see fit, peacefully and in accordance with applicable laws. I have chosen to live in a place where the laws better reflect my views than do the laws in many other areas of the nation. That my lifestyle, or the laws or culture of my chosen State do not conform to your superior views of how the world should be ordered, is so far beyond your control that your on going insistence to rail against them expose your own problems.
Do enjoy living with the knowledge of your absolute impotence to change either.
Last edited:
