• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

New obama quote regarding guns

The Donkey

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
1,114
Location
Northern Virginia
imported post

Thanks Ory & 1st Free for your substantive answers!

IDHO, (In Donkey's Humble Opinion)no matter who gets to be Prez, state concealed carry is safe, but national CCR is not going anywhere in the next 4 years.
 

deepdiver

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
5,820
Location
Southeast, Missouri, USA
imported post

The Donkey wrote:
Thanks Ory & 1st Free for your substantive answers!

IDHO, (In Donkey's Humble Opinion)no matter who gets to be Prez, state concealed carry is safe, Not entirely convinced on this issue if Obama is elected and the dems, as expected, pick up seats in both houses. Pelosi, Reid and Obama are all very arrogant and have a history such that any election of Obama will be deemed a mandate for their agendas.

but national CCR is not going anywhere in the next 4 years Finally something on which I can totally agree with you. As long as Pelosi and Reid control congress such a matter would not even make it to the floor for a vote and even if the GOP regained control of both houses in 2010 I doubt that they would have the votes or the political will to buck the Northeast states, IL and CA to pass such a measure. I certainly hope we are both absolutely wrong.
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

The Donkey wrote:
Orygunner wrote:

The video is worth watching, because Obama is misquoted above:

He pledges to uphold 2A for self protection as well as sports,

And that he will not, and does not want to, take guns away from anyone but criminals and the mentally ill.

Then, referring to "your gun"he says:

"By the way, here's another thing you got to understand:

Even if I wanted to take it away, I couldn't get it done. I don't have the votes in Congress. . .

This can't be the reason not to vote for me; because your guns, we're not going to mess with them."

IMHO:

1. there is no difference between what Obama says about his opinions on guns in this video, and McCain's declared positions on guns;

2. what Obama says about votes for gun control in Congress is correct.:)


Sorry not buying it.
I don't think this quote is taken out of context. Yeah I know McCain has said he was for closing the 'private sale loophole' but I feel he will listen to my objections to it more than Obama will and don't claim Obama was talking about full autos, the AWB had nothing to do with them.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/070715-remarks_of_sena_12/

Part of the solution has to come from government. And government has to care. Each year, thousands of guns are sold without the dealer doing a background check. And many unscrupulous dealers are exploiting the system by operating full-fledged businesses without following federal gun laws. To make sure guns don't end up in the wrong hands, we need to close the gun show loophole and tighten our background checks by improving the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. And we need to make the expired Assault Weapon ban permanent. A couple of weeks ago, cops found an AK-47 near a West Side School. That type of weapon belongs on a battlefield, not on our streets.
 

The Donkey

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
1,114
Location
Northern Virginia
imported post

longwatch wrote:
The Donkey wrote:
Orygunner wrote:

The video is worth watching, because Obama is misquoted above:

He pledges to uphold 2A for self protection as well as sports,

And that he will not, and does not want to, take guns away from anyone but criminals and the mentally ill.

Then, referring to "your gun"he says:

"By the way, here's another thing you got to understand:

Even if I wanted to take it away, I couldn't get it done. I don't have the votes in Congress. . .

This can't be the reason not to vote for me; because your guns, we're not going to mess with them."

IMHO:

1. there is no difference between what Obama says about his opinions on guns in this video, and McCain's declared positions on guns;

2. what Obama says about votes for gun control in Congress is correct.:)


Sorry not buying it.
I don't think this quote is taken out of context. Yeah I know McCain has said he was for closing the 'private sale loophole' but I feel he will listen to my objections to it more than Obama will and don't claim Obama was talking about full autos, the AWB had nothing to do with them.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/070715-remarks_of_sena_12/

Part of the solution has to come from government. And government has to care. Each year, thousands of guns are sold without the dealer doing a background check. And many unscrupulous dealers are exploiting the system by operating full-fledged businesses without following federal gun laws. To make sure guns don't end up in the wrong hands, we need to close the gun show loophole and tighten our background checks by improving the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. And we need to make the expired Assault Weapon ban permanent. A couple of weeks ago, cops found an AK-47 near a West Side School. That type of weapon belongs on a battlefield, not on our streets.


Only by mindreading can we distinguish McCain's endorsementof gunshow loophole closing from Obama's. Both don't see a problem with this gradualist backdoor to gun registration, and they have had plenty of time to think about it and get advise about it.

I am prepared to take McCain at his word because he doesn't gain anythingby being on the side of the "anti"s here. And because he is republican, he stands a better chance (whatever the chances) of getting the darn thing passed.

As to AWB, it wouldn't take anybodys guns away, but would impose arbitrary and ridiculous restrictions on the importation and transfer of guns and gun receivers, just like it did before. Has to -- it is the nature of the beast.Congress recognizes this, and just doesn't want to go there. They know that they will get thumped if they renew it, and cannot figure out how to redo it otherwise.

Even if you are right and Obama doeswant the AWB, and is not persuadable,I count at least 54 hardened votes against AWB renewal in the Senate. I just see no way around the math, even if, God Forbid,there werethree Columbines in a month.
That fact has just gotta factor into decisions about Presidents and veeps.

There are otherissues where who we pick can make a difference. Make no mistake, these guys and gal have the power to wreck everything -- just not in re firearms (at least not now).

I see theRepublican candidates as detached from reality in their wishful thinking on national security, taxes, trade and the environment.McCain has not always been this bad, but we just gotta take him athis word about where heis now, as opposed to the "Maverick" he may once have been.
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

The Donkey wrote:

Only by mindreading can we distinguish McCain's endorsementof gunshow loophole closing from Obama's. Both don't see a problem with this gradualist backdoor to gun registration, and they have had plenty of time to think about it and get advise about it.

I am prepared to take McCain at his word because he doesn't gain anythingby being on the side of the "anti"s here. And because he is republican, he stands a better chance (whatever the chances) of getting the darn thing passed.

As to AWB, it wouldn't take anybodys guns away, but would impose arbitrary and ridiculous restrictions on the importation and transfer of guns and gun receivers, just like it did before. Has to -- it is the nature of the beast.Congress recognizes this, and just doesn't want to go there. They know that they will get thumped if they renew it, and cannot figure out how to redo it otherwise.

Even if you are right and Obama doeswant the AWB, and is not persuadable,I count at least 54 hardened votes against AWB renewal in the Senate. I just see no way around the math, even if, God Forbid,there werethree Columbines in a month.
That fact has just gotta factor into decisions about Presidents and veeps.

There are otherissues where who we pick can make a difference. Make no mistake, these guys and gal have the power to wreck everything -- just not in re firearms (at least not now).

I see theRepublican candidates as detached from reality in their wishful thinking on national security, taxes, trade and the environment.McCain has not always been this bad, but we just gotta take him athis word about where heis now, as opposed to the "Maverick" he may once have been.
There are a lot more issues than just AWB and Gun Shows at stake. There may be issues like National Parks and the DC gun ban, how the BATFE goes about their enforcement of gun laws, who gets sent to the UN to fight IANSA, and probably unforseen situations that are in direct control of the executive branch. Obama has convinced me that in an executive capacity he won't be a friend of the RKBA.
 

Teej

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
522
Location
, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

The Donkey wrote:

As to AWB, it wouldn't take anybodys guns away, but would impose arbitrary and ridiculous restrictions on the importation and transfer of guns and gun receivers, just like it did before. Has to -- it is the nature of the beast.Congress recognizes this, and just doesn't want to go there. They know that they will get thumped if they renew it, and cannot figure out how to redo it otherwise.

Two words. Executive Order.

With one swift stroke of the pen, the President could halt the import of firearms and components.

No Congress required.
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

That's a good point repealing the importation AWB could be doable under McCain but would definitely continue under Obama.
 

Deanimator

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
2,083
Location
Rocky River, OH, U.S.A.
imported post

The Donkey wrote:
longwatch wrote:
The Donkey wrote:
Orygunner wrote:

The video is worth watching, because Obama is misquoted above:

He pledges to uphold 2A for self protection as well as sports,

And that he will not, and does not want to, take guns away from anyone but criminals and the mentally ill.

Then, referring to "your gun"he says:

"By the way, here's another thing you got to understand:

Even if I wanted to take it away, I couldn't get it done. I don't have the votes in Congress. . .

This can't be the reason not to vote for me; because your guns, we're not going to mess with them."

IMHO:

1. there is no difference between what Obama says about his opinions on guns in this video, and McCain's declared positions on guns;

2. what Obama says about votes for gun control in Congress is correct.:)


Sorry not buying it.
I don't think this quote is taken out of context. Yeah I know McCain has said he was for closing the 'private sale loophole' but I feel he will listen to my objections to it more than Obama will and don't claim Obama was talking about full autos, the AWB had nothing to do with them.

http://obama.senate.gov/speech/070715-remarks_of_sena_12/

Part of the solution has to come from government. And government has to care. Each year, thousands of guns are sold without the dealer doing a background check. And many unscrupulous dealers are exploiting the system by operating full-fledged businesses without following federal gun laws. To make sure guns don't end up in the wrong hands, we need to close the gun show loophole and tighten our background checks by improving the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. And we need to make the expired Assault Weapon ban permanent. A couple of weeks ago, cops found an AK-47 near a West Side School. That type of weapon belongs on a battlefield, not on our streets.


Only by mindreading can we distinguish McCain's endorsementof gunshow loophole closing from Obama's. Both don't see a problem with this gradualist backdoor to gun registration, and they have had plenty of time to think about it and get advise about it.

I am prepared to take McCain at his word because he doesn't gain anythingby being on the side of the "anti"s here. And because he is republican, he stands a better chance (whatever the chances) of getting the darn thing passed.

As to AWB, it wouldn't take anybodys guns away, but would impose arbitrary and ridiculous restrictions on the importation and transfer of guns and gun receivers, just like it did before. Has to -- it is the nature of the beast.Congress recognizes this, and just doesn't want to go there. They know that they will get thumped if they renew it, and cannot figure out how to redo it otherwise.

Even if you are right and Obama doeswant the AWB, and is not persuadable,I count at least 54 hardened votes against AWB renewal in the Senate. I just see no way around the math, even if, God Forbid,there werethree Columbines in a month.
That fact has just gotta factor into decisions about Presidents and veeps.

There are otherissues where who we pick can make a difference. Make no mistake, these guys and gal have the power to wreck everything -- just not in re firearms (at least not now).

I see theRepublican candidates as detached from reality in their wishful thinking on national security, taxes, trade and the environment.McCain has not always been this bad, but we just gotta take him athis word about where heis now, as opposed to the "Maverick" he may once have been.




Anybody who has spoken in favor of:

1. A BAN on handguns

2. A NATIONWIDE BAN on CCW

3. Prosecution of those who act in self-defense in defiance of gun bans

is COMPLETELY unacceptable. And that's wholely over and above the fact that he comes out of the most corrupt political machine in the nation and to the best of my knowledge has never condemned the endemic police culture of racism, brutality and sheer criminality.

No thanks.
 

hogleg

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
168
Location
KC,MO, ,
imported post

I don't think we have seen the extent of this played out yet in this election. I think McCain is making his stand on the gunshow loophole out of ignorance and his feeling this might help prevent the gunshows from disappearing all together.Not because hedoesn't careor wants to reduce gun ownership. i just don't think he understands as many folks don't.

I have no doubt as to where or why Obama is making his stand and his end goal, no matter what he says to his hand picked crowds. History proves his position.

Watch and see how this plays out. A life member of the NRA,his VPpick, educating McCain along the way and explaining how gun owners feel about this and any other infringments on the 2A. Just because someone is friendly or supportiveof the 2A position does not mean they understand why so many regard it as the highest right we have. I see his eyes opening a bit more on this,as anyone who spend time around a lifemember usually will get an education onthe 2A and it's importance.

Obama will never change because he does not believe we have the right, he merely believes that the government lets them play with the notion they can bear arms. If he really did believe in the 2a then hewould have let everyone know prior to the ruling by thecourt. And nobody would have to ask him what his position was.
 

Slayer of Paper

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
460
Location
Phoenix, Arizona, USA
imported post

I'll agree with that- I don't think McCain really understands what the "gun show loop-hole" really is, and he certainly doesn't understand why so many of us are against "closing" it.

We (at least I, don't mean to speak for others out of turn) aren't concerned about having to have a NICS check when buying a gun from a private citizen (other than the added cost that an FFL is sure to ask for). I can pass a NICS check every time. My biggest problem with the so-called "closing of the gun show loop-hole" is that it means that there would be no way I could buy a gun anymore that the government didn't have a record of my ownership of that gun (legally- I don't see how they intend to enforce it).

If the solution was to offer a FREE service to conduct the NICS check and NOT make you fill out a 4473, then I would have no problem with that solution.

Maybe we can get McCain to understand that, and maybe he'll change his mind or at least his solution on the gun show loop-hole thing.
 

hogleg

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2007
Messages
168
Location
KC,MO, ,
imported post

Agreed..... I am kind of curious to see how much rubs off from his VP. I am sure he knows she is carrying him now and has to know some of the reasons why. This being one of them. Kind fo foolish to throw that away.

I know many gun owners that have never bought a gun at a gun show or even from a private party. I also know people who have never bought from anyone but a private party.I think it just comes down to education on what goes down at gun shows. You will not get that education from the ANTI's. That is like ajanitor teaching Nuclear Physics. No offense intendedto the janitor btw.

I have bought guns from pretty much anywhere that sells em legal (including Gun shows). my favorite is the internet. Isn't America great? You can look online, plop down some E currency and have UPS drop a gun off in a few days at your neighbor FFL pay him $25 and whammo, hours offun at the range. I love this country. I don't even have to go to the show or store anymore. ohhhh maybeI shouldn't tell them libs about that.......................Well they don't want to prevent me from owning a gun anyways so why not :?
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

hogleg wrote:
snip...............Well they don't want to prevent me from owning a gun anyways so why not :?
pssst - yes some of them do!

Yata hey
 

SFDoc

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
221
Location
Hopewell, Virginia, USA
imported post

Teej wrote:
Two words. Executive Order.

With one swift stroke of the pen, the President could halt the import of firearms and components.

No Congress required.
Correct me if I'm wrong but if elected, our new Messiahdoesn't even have to do that. With the right judges, it's good-bye 2-A and anything else onhis wish list.He could just set back and claim thathe didn't do it, it was the courts that did it.
 

The Donkey

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
1,114
Location
Northern Virginia
imported post

On the Prez: under what authority could he issue such an Order:question:

On the judiciary:

You're wrong.

They can't and they won't.

Stand corrected:exclaim:
 

Teej

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
522
Location
, Wisconsin, USA
imported post

The Donkey wrote:
On the Prez: under what authority could he issue such an Order:question:
:what:

Wow.

Just....wow....

Start here...it's a good primer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order_(United_States)

Then to see how it's relevant...proceed here.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june98/guns_4-6.html

There's more to it than I have time to go into here. And yes, there's plenty of anti-bush (both of them) material that could be brought up on the subject of EOs and firearms before you go pointing out what "they" did, in addition to this one about clinton...
 

The Donkey

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
1,114
Location
Northern Virginia
imported post

Thank you!

Fascinating:

So the President is -- under the 1968 law (by EO) -- free to ban the importation of any firearm not used in his opinion for a "Sporting" purpose, and the expiration of the 1994 firearms ban is irrelevant to this?
 

tarzan1888

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2007
Messages
1,435
Location
, , USA
imported post

deepdiver wrote:
The Donkey wrote:
And that he will not, and does not want to, take guns away from anyone but criminals and the mentally ill.
That doesn't make sense. Why would he only want to disarm his political base?




:celebrate

:p

roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif
roflmao1.gif






Tarzan
 
Top