You are repeating yourself, not addressing the refutation. I’ll wait for something new from someone else. Thank you.
Nuff said!
You are repeating yourself, not addressing the refutation. I’ll wait for something new from someone else. Thank you.
Laws that infringe provide cover for cops protecting them from penalties. They can claim that they were acting in good faith, enforcing a law. The point of National Preemption is to get laws removed and to punish the passing of laws that inringe.
National Preemption will help hold cops accountable by removing laws that provide them cover.
___
Oh, and thanks for demonstrating civil disagreement. I gain a lot from discussions with you.
Laws that infringe provide cover for cops protecting them from penalties. They can claim that they were acting in good faith, enforcing a law. The point of National Preemption is to get laws removed and to punish the passing of laws that inringe.
National Preemption will help hold cops accountable by removing laws that provide them cover.
___
Oh, and thanks for demonstrating civil disagreement. I gain a lot from discussions with you.
Again, the law I propose does not ask any State to enforce anything, let alone a federal law. It prohibits behavior on their part and on the part of local governments and assigns penalties. If those governments participate in that behavior, they could be punished for having done so.
Please cite one case where a state official was prosecuted and convicted for not enforcing a federal law. And if convicted, was not overturned.Of course they can make State behavior against citizens illegal, and prefer criminal charges when State actors violate federal law.
Of course they can make State behavior against citizens illegal, and prefer criminal charges when State actors violate federal law.
Again, the law I propose does not ask any State to enforce anything, let alone a federal law. It prohibits behavior on their part and on the part of local governments and assigns penalties. If those governments participate in that behavior, they could be punished for having done so.
One last time, I have not once said that my proposal require state officials to enforce any federal law.Please cite one case where a state official was prosecuted and convicted for not enforcing a federal law. And if convicted, was not overturned.
Just so its clear to the entire world, that appreciation wasn’t (and never will be) directed at trolls. Not even our resident troll.
One last time, I have not once said that my proposal require state officials to enforce any federal law.
My proposal makes certain actions by the State and local governments illegal and assesses penalties.
You have simply picked up and repeated a mistaken talking point of another poster. I won’t waste my time on that point again.
It amazes me how disingenuously some around here try to debate.
And, how do you propose to enforce the penalty???????......My proposal makes certain actions by the State and local governments illegal and assesses penalties.......