• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Limit on Mag Capacity added to Cyber Security Bill

Gil223

Gil223

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
1,392
Location
Weber County Utah
Michigander said:
In a word, treason.
Click to expand...

In the article Chuck Schumer talks about "reasonableness":
“We can debate where to draw the line of reasonableness, but we might be able to come to an agreement in the middle,” Schumer said.
Click to expand...
What is reasonable about tacking gun control measures onto a Cyber Security Bill? This has been a pet peeve of mine for decades - Congress' ability to tack on unrelated BS ideas to a bill that otherwise (sometimes) makes good sense. Effemall! :mad: Pax...
 
davidmcbeth

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
He suggested that Democrats make it clear that their goal is not to repeal the Second Amendment.

The idiot actually said this .... he said a lot of MAYBES .... laughable ... but I'm glad ... it just lets the people know what they want ...

amendment would never pass ...

this water is not wet!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top