• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Ever get something extra when you order on line...do you send it back?

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,936
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Just to let you know: I respect you. CoL is the one who attempted to put the label “jerk” on you, not me.

I said that CoL’s post was a jerk post. It is. Your post was an opinion with which I disagree, but presented in an adult manner.
Sorry, you opened wide and inserted your foot and now you are trying to remove it makes you look more like a fool.
 

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,315
Location
here nc
I used it once as an analogy. Someone questioned it, calling it policy. I posted this one last tweet demonstrating that folks can be charged with a crime for keeping the money.

But you gotta put up a jerk reply.

Folks, this is a perfect example of me making rational posts, and coloroflaw trying to turn it into a playground contest. He and a few others have ruined this once-great site.

Go ahead, coloroflaw, put up another jerk response, I won’t reply to it. I’ll stick to rational responses to adult posters.

Eye95, tis quite obvious from your incoherent post above you are decompensating rapidly as it shows you are exhibiting & engaging in bizarre and more unusal cognive behavior than your other outburts, especially as evidenced by name-calling, inability to spell a member’s name properly, stating your belief your out of the blue & without any segue irrational statement was in in fact a rational statement, as well as unfounded illusions of pending forum collapse.

Quite disturbing to see an individual of your character exhibit this type of behavior on a public venue as it truly degrades and absolutely destroys any and all credibility you feel you might have had.

Again, eye95, if you require emergency assistance type help and someone will affect a response.
 

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,315
Location
here nc
I duck-duck-went “can you keep a bank error in your favor?”.

My conclusion? You can’t. And it ain’t just policy. People who know the windfall is a mistake and try to make use of the money get charged with crimes.

Here is one article. [It links three other examples; only the first one still works.]


So eye95, a nine [9] year olde cite written during the 08 Great Recession is viable? Really...

“Ain’t just policy” what on earth do you call the stack of paperwork the banking entities make you sign before they take your money for their use?

So citizens are charged with crimes are those criminal vice civil suits? Do you have any type of cite of law for this claim.

You broght it up mate, you have been called and again found wanting!

Bing/google https://www.fdic.gov/consumers/assistance/protection/index.html

You’re most certainly welcome if it means you stop repeating the hearsay from a retired teller!
[Gheee equates to asking a retired nyc LE about ohio’s gun laws and rgaling it as gospel]
 
Last edited:
Top