So you'll be voting Obama?
On a national stage Romney has assured Second Amendment policy makers their agenda is embraced on a National Stage.
What could you achieve more than Romney in MA?
Court is the last place on the planet to look forward to relief. Legislation is the place to be.
Everything became a 'state issue' to Romney when he ditched all of the values he had proven he had as governor and took to the national stage.
I wouldn't look very hard. He's a HELL of a lot better than Obama.
We need a leader with b***s of steel, not aluminum foil, and one who has the best interests of the country at heart
By b***s of steel, are you referring to sending more troops into needless, undeclared, and unconstitutional wars to show our military might, but weakening our national defense? So that more combat troops can come home and be put on prescriptions that have suicide listed as a side effect? Or creating more false flags to go to war with countries that are no threat to our national defense, like Iran? (Which was done in the Gulf of Tonkin and Iraq) I've yet to hear a solid argument from anyone on why Iran is such a threat, but according to Democrats and Republicans alike, we MUST go to war. Again, from chickenhawks who never served in the military, or better yet got deferments when their time was called.
By b***s of steel, are you referring to sending more troops into needless, undeclared, and unconstitutional wars to show our military might, but weakening our national defense? So that more combat troops can come home and be put on prescriptions that have suicide listed as a side effect? Or creating more false flags to go to war with countries that are no threat to our national defense, like Iran? (Which was done in the Gulf of Tonkin and Iraq) I've yet to hear a solid argument from anyone on why Iran is such a threat, but according to Democrats and Republicans alike, we MUST go to war. Again, from chickenhawks who never served in the military, or better yet got deferments when their time was called.
Nosie O'Donnell and George Looney are among those who love "false flag" theories. Although "false flags" have been used (if not documented) by people since the beginning of both personal and community/national conflicts, not all confrontations are based upon false flags. There is evil in this world. For example, the U.N. (which desires control of the world), and those who believe Islam must rule the world, and who will use any and all means available to them in order to reach that goal.The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president.
By b***s of steel, are you referring to sending more troops into needless, undeclared, and unconstitutional wars to show our military might, but weakening our national defense? So that more combat troops can come home and be put on prescriptions that have suicide listed as a side effect? Or creating more false flags to go to war with countries that are no threat to our national defense, like Iran? (Which was done in the Gulf of Tonkin and Iraq) I've yet to hear a solid argument from anyone on why Iran is such a threat, but according to Democrats and Republicans alike, we MUST go to war. Again, from chickenhawks who never served in the military, or better yet got deferments when their time was called.
Please, explain to me this arbitrary argument that Romney is better than Obama. Is it the trillions of dollars spent in support of the auto bailouts, the "too big to fail" banks, or the stimulus spending. Because I can assure you that both men support both. Or is it the abortion issue? Well, we probably don't know where Romney ACTUALLY stands on it because when he was running for governor in Mass, when I lived there before joining the Marines, he was very pro-choice. Maybe it's that Obamacare that's unconstitutional. Thank god Romney provided the blueprint. Or is it the continuing of perpetual war by building up his advisors with neo-Conservatives who want nothing but perpetual war (but have never actually gone themselves) with Iran, even though there is no evidence that Iran is even close to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Sounds like 2003 all over again in Iraq.
Don't take this comment as my support for Obama, because he is the last candidate I would ever vote for. But PLEASE, stop trying to fool yourselves that Romney is a conservative. What are they going to argue at the debates? Who is less liberal? That's where we are at. I've been a life long Republican and have always voted to whoever has a (R) next to their name. After this primary season, I've left the Republican party for good until they change their party platform with ACTUAL limited government and individual liberty. Until then, good luck with your Governor. Semper Fi.
-Eric
Are you really that stupid? Do you believe that if we just pull out all our forces, close our bases, abandon our allies, and never intervene that the rest of the world will somehow leave us alone? What color is the sky in your world? You sound just like a liberal.