And what evidence, pray tell, might you be in possession of that shows what Jason Tulley "is more interested in," or tends to demonstrate in any way that he even knows a single thing about the dispute that you're so obsessively focused on?
The fact that he won't post the information here, but will simply allow this site to be abused for his personal purposes.
Are you suggesting that Jason Tulley has posted links here to BamaCarry? All I've seen here that have confirmed they're associated with BC were by posters with user names that aren't Jason's, and they speak of him in the third person, so I don't think that they are him. And from what I remember of him (Jason) first posting at ALOC, he told his story as though he was asking the readership where to turn for help. In other words, at that time anyway, he wasn't a "gun guy" that hung out at gun forums, he just found himself in a situation he couldn't handle alone. So he reached out to an Alabama-specific website and got quite a bit of good, even great, advice. After his conviction, the last I heard was that there would be no more news until the appeal rolled around, and as you can see by my post-count here, which is even thinner there (by a long-shot), I went back to my old haunts and waited until the case surfaced again. So yesterday, I'm having a conversation with a friend on another forum and he recommends I come to the OC.org/Alabama sub-forum for some info on the new law, I did, and the first thing I see is a fresh thread about the Tulley case. I click on it and find myself in a toilet-bowl-vortex of antipathy that I *think* has nothing to do with Jason Tulley, but with some unrelated feud between you and people who deign to visit BamaCarry without your blessings. But guess what? Now I see I was wrong about that, as you are now claiming that Jason Tulley, "...won't post the information here, but will simply allow this site to be abused for his personal purposes." The worst part is that you said that in response to my inquiry as to what evidence you might have to even suggest that he knows about all the petty schoolgirl BS you're engaging in here, and instead of answering that question, you double-down with accusations of him abusing this site when neither you or I even know if he's ever viewed a single page of this site.
You are completely daft.
I was a part of the original BamaCarry and watched the theft of the name. So what I say is true, whether you choose to believe it or not. If you don't like the reaction of a member of OCDO, then I suggest that y'all don't come over here and abuse this site. If you are truly interested in Tulley's case and want to discuss it here, then post the relevant information here.
I saw where you got another thread locked because of bad-mouthing another gun-rights website. Actually, no, it was the same website you're bad-mouthing here. Is that what you're going for here? Because someone whom you don't know decided to post the documents relating to his case on a gun-rights website you don't like, a case that you knew nothing of before this thread was started, you want to lock down discussion of his case here? While at the same time making baseless and false accusations concerning the victim of the oath-breakers who have trampled his liberties that you claimed in Post #2 that he "earned" because he was "trespassing" when you didn't have a freakin' clue what you were talking about?
To the Mods and/or Administrator(s) - Please don't let this thread or topic crash and burn because of these petty cross-site arguments. Jason Tulley's case is an important one for Alabama. If decided in our favor, it could become the precedent needed to get rid of an ambiguous statute that gives LE way more discretion in arresting for OC than any legislature ever contemplated them having. This is an appeals court case, not a peeing contest about which website is "acceptable" to a non-mod/Admin to link to. Please put a stop to those (or the one, as the case may be) responsible for the thread-jack. Thanks.