• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Armed Militia Take over Federal Reserve

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
you truly believe your own rhetoric don't ya>

ipse


You truly don't believe the American right to protect themselves or you wouldn't have posted such a thing. A man was murdered in cold blood with his hands up and you call my post rhetoric? Well I hope you're never the target of criminals whether civilian or government because you'll just roll over and let them do whatever

https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-sets-checkpoints-around-oregon-refuge-deadly-confrontation-140355598.html

... bet there will be a wild story when ol' Wigwam blankethead shows up again.

noooooooope! illegal. No searches, no detainment without RAS. Why are those invaders still there anyway? This is public land with no rights whatsoever to control it like it's being. The sooner they are removed and taught we the people are in control, the better. That's if the people will defend themselves
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
You truly don't believe the American right to protect themselves or you wouldn't have posted such a thing. A man was murdered in cold blood with his hands up and you call my post rhetoric? Well I hope you're never the target of criminals whether civilian or government because you'll just roll over and let them do whatever

noooooooope! illegal. No searches, no detainment without RAS. Why are those invaders still there anyway? This is public land with no rights whatsoever to control it like it's being. The sooner they are removed and taught we the people are in control, the better. That's if the people will defend themselves
You do mean through the courts and legislatures, right?
 

beebobby

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
847
Location
, ,
So, a guy who literally told reporters he wouldn't be taken alive to jail wasn't taken alive to jail. Anyone surprised? He should have stayed hiding under his tarp.
 
Last edited:

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
You do mean through the courts and legislatures, right?
Of course not. Self defense is a basic human instinct. You don't go to a judge before you remove a trespasser, you do it. Especially if he's armed. Fear of death or great physical harm is certainly justifiable cause.

Sent from my HTC Desire 626s using Tapatalk
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
You truly don't believe the American right to protect themselves or you wouldn't have posted such a thing. A man was murdered in cold blood with his hands up and you call my post rhetoric? Well I hope you're never the target of criminals whether civilian or government because you'll just roll over and let them do whatever

noooooooope! illegal. No searches, no detainment without RAS. Why are those invaders still there anyway? This is public land with no rights whatsoever to control it like it's being. The sooner they are removed and taught we the people are in control, the better. That's if the people will defend themselves

You do mean through the courts and legislatures, right?

Of course not. Self defense is a basic human instinct. You don't go to a judge before you remove a trespasser, you do it. Especially if he's armed. Fear of death or great physical harm is certainly justifiable cause.

Sent from my HTC Desire 626s using Tapatalk
Your argument is inconsistant.

"Public land" > remove them > people defending themselves > now claiming basic right to self defense. When you are part of the problem.........

Forum Rule #15 still applies.
 

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,315
Location
here nc
You truly don't believe the American right to protect themselves or you wouldn't have posted such a thing. A man was murdered in cold blood with his hands up and you call my post rhetoric? Well I hope you're never the target of criminals whether civilian or government because you'll just roll over and let them do whatever

i actually did post such a thing to point out your inciteful and misplaced bravado on a public forum.

if you doubt my veracity to defend myself and those i hold near and dear against bad guys who wish to do us ill, go read my history of forum posts.

good luck with your current rant in what some could perceive as non-law biding rhetoric.

ipse
 

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
Your argument is inconsistant.

"Public land" > remove them > people defending themselves > now claiming basic right to self defense. When you are part of the problem.........

Forum Rule #15 still applies.

Now i'm lost. How can I be part of the problem, when I didnt murder people, nor am I a member of the BLM who has harassed people for years and stolen property among other things.

I really should clarify myself, that was a total mess :p

ok, while public land is public that and in theory can be used by anyone, when one group decides they have the right (without constitutional basis) to control that land, then they need to be reminded of their lack of the right of control. When that group decides to issue decrees, then obviously those degrees mean nothing as they don't have the right to exercise authority there. Now when that group decides to dig their heals in and with the help of other groups like the FBI, force people to obey those unlawful decrees, you then have a situation where one is either has to use force to remove the threat, or submit to decrees that have no business being made. Hopefully that helps.
 

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
good luck with your current rant in what some could perceive as non-law biding rhetoric.

ipse

One has no need to obey something that isnt law and the person spewing foolishness has no right to make. That's what it is in reality. Utter foolishness. Treat them like a playground bully.

Reminds me of the local one who decided to make a pain of himself when I was about 11. We both were about that. he decided that it was clever to throw stones and spit from a distance and run like a coward. So one day I rushed him and pounded him. I did not break bones, I didnt kill him, but I used enough force to teach him a lesson. Same principle, only with adults, it's a lot harder to deal with a bully that is capable of killing you.
 

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,315
Location
here nc
One has no need to obey something that isnt law and the person spewing foolishness has no right to make. That's what it is in reality. Utter foolishness. Treat them like a playground bully.

Reminds me of the local one who decided to make a pain of himself when I was about 11. We both were about that. he decided that it was clever to throw stones and spit from a distance and run like a coward. So one day I rushed him and pounded him. I did not break bones, I didnt kill him, but I used enough force to teach him a lesson. Same principle, only with adults, it's a lot harder to deal with a bully that is capable of killing you.


interesting insight...

enough force used to stop a child from throwing stones and spitting at you FROM A DISTANCE....

and who, in your opinion makes the determination who is the bully and provides you the right 'to deal with' them?

ipse
 

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
interesting insight...

enough force used to stop a child from throwing stones and spitting at you FROM A DISTANCE....

and who, in your opinion makes the determination who is the bully and provides you the right 'to deal with' them?

ipse

Have to look at the Constitution. Ask if the person has the right to make the decrees and dictate. If not, then whatever they have said or demanded cannot rightfully be enforced. If the attempt is made, that is when force is used to eliminate the threat and such force should only be the minimum required.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
One has no need to obey something that isnt law and the person spewing foolishness has no right to make. That's what it is in reality. Utter foolishness. Treat them like a playground bully.

Reminds me of the local one who decided to make a pain of himself when I was about 11. We both were about that. he decided that it was clever to throw stones and spit from a distance and run like a coward. So one day I rushed him and pounded him. I did not break bones, I didnt kill him, but I used enough force to teach him a lesson. Same principle, only with adults, it's a lot harder to deal with a bully that is capable of killing you.
"Spewing foolishness" = 1st Amendment right normally.

As responsible adults, we must understand Assault and Battery is not the answer. That is when you become part of the problem and in violation of Forum Rules.

Gotta look in my kit bag for appropriate tool to rectify the problem.
 

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
"Spewing foolishness" = 1st Amendment right normally.

As responsible adults, we must understand Assault and Battery is not the answer. That is when you become part of the problem and in violation of Forum Rules.

Gotta look in my kit bag for appropriate tool to rectify the problem.

The key is the minimal force needed to remove the threat. Not wanton revenge violence for the safe of it. That would be stupid and counterproductive and what I never have and never will suggest. It's not a case of submit or slaughter everybody. It never was an either or scenario. I cannot emphasise enough the words reasonable force. This is what gives OCers and Patriots their reputation. They avoid violence unless needed. But are willing to use it, if it becomes a necessity
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
The key is the minimal force needed to remove the threat. Not wanton revenge violence for the safe of it. That would be stupid and counterproductive and what I never have and never will suggest. It's not a case of submit or slaughter everybody. It never was an either or scenario. I cannot emphasise enough the words reasonable force. This is what gives OCers and Patriots their reputation. They avoid violence unless needed. But are willing to use it, if it becomes a necessity
And legal.
 

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
And legal.

And this, as far as OCDO is concerned is the crux of the matter. The law, hinges on the Constitution. What is contrary to that is not and cannot be law, therefore there is no legal compulsion to submit to something that cannot even exist under the supreme and absolute law of the land - the Constitution.

It would be like someone telling you, you can't wear a political t-shirt walking down the road. You'd take zero notice whatsoever at such a 'law' because the right to make it, doesnt exist.

14th Amendment Article one
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Well that immediately voids federal rights to control land and also voids the Oregon prohibition of defense against the unlawful actions of police as well as further nullifies any and all restrictions on the keeping or bearing of arms. This is after the well known Supremacy clause which clearly states

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land

That destroys any and all notions that just because somebody says 'this is law' means it actually is.
 

utbagpiper

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
4,061
Location
Utah
"Spewing foolishness" = 1st Amendment right normally.

1st amendment rights apply to the citizens, not the government. And if I've not entirely missed the context, it is the federal government that rightwinglibertarian has painted as spewing foolishness that they have no proper constitutional power to spew.


As responsible adults, we must understand Assault and Battery is not the answer. That is when you become part of the problem and in violation of Forum Rules.

It is important that we abide forum rules, especially regarding not advocating for any violation of the law. The reasons are obvious and shouldn't need to be reiterated.

I've made clear on a number of occasions that I do not support the illegal conduct of the Bundy's and their fellows in Oregon.

That said, those who wish to have an accurate understanding of the situation, need to understand the environment. There isn't a State east of Colorado that could function for more than one fiscal cycle if they suddenly lost 60%+ of their land area from both the tax rolls and all opportunity for economic development. The Western Great Basin is arid. You can't support yourself, much less raise a cash crop of much of anything on the proverbial (non-irrigated) 40 acres.

Nobody would have established family ranches on public lands 150 years ago if congress had told them that in a couple of generations their water rights (Can't just drill a well even on your own land out here. Even subterranean water is held in common by the States and is metered out with permits called "Water Rights".) and grazing rights would be squeezed down to the point of bankrupting them. Families would not have invested in the work and infrastructure to install watering troughs and the water works to keep them full. Miners and lumberjacks would not have invested in cutting roads through rough terrain if their rights to use the land were going to be revoked in the not distant future.

We've watched as Federal Land managers have allowed beetle infestations to destroy entire mountains of usable timber, and then spread to the next mountain, rather than cut some trees to stop the spread (think fire break). Even when the trees are dead, harvesting the timber is forbidden. Land is not reseeded and mud slides result. Small fires are put out, but without harvesting lumber, fuel builds until devastating fires do tremendous damage.

Roads that have been in existence since horse drawn wagons used them, and that were expressly protected and encouraged under RS 2477, and expressly protected when that law was repealed in 1976, have been closed in contradiction of the law. A county commissioner has been convicted by the feds for peacefully riding his 4-wheeler ATV up one of these roads, recently. To make matters worse, the road remains accessible for trucks to use to service the municipal culinary well in the area. It has been closed by the feds to deny recreational access.

In my State of Utah, a land area larger than Rhode Island or Delaware was turned into a National Monument with the stroke of Bill Clinton's pen. He didn't even have the guts to sign the EO here in Utah, but did the deed in Arizona. The second largest reserve of low sulfur coal in the world is now off limits to any development. The town of Escalante may soon become a ghost town. Ditto Tropic. The coal town of Price is being killed with the President's/EPA's extreme environmental rules. The coal fired power plant has been shuttered. A similar fate awaits many other small mining and ranching towns throughout the West as the feds run us off our own land.

Federal SWAT teams are used to raid the homes of peaceful doctors who are suspected of having collected a few pieces of pottery or arrow heads from federal land.

Most of us became States after the War Between the States concluded. Our inter-generational memories of what was promised our grand-parents regarding perpetual multiple use of and access to federally controlled lands is as fresh in our minds as are the abuses of the carpetbaggers and Reconstruction in your memories. And while Reconstruction ended and you were allowed to rebuild, we've never been freed from the on-going economic and political oppression created and enforced by the federal control of over half of our State's land. You folks back east are basically good and decent people (at least those south of the Mason-Dixon line). But we don't want you controlling our State any more than you'd want us controlling yours. And that goes 10x for those sanctimonious, hypocritical, gun grabbing, liberal New Englanders north of DC.

Let me reiterate, that I don't agree with violation of the law. I believe that Ammon Bundy and his fellows have diverted attention away from the very legitimate issue of federal oppression of Western States and onto a bunch of nuts with guns.

But their cause is just. Their crimes are less serious than those of the Occupy Wall Street idiots. And I'm saddened to see anyone come to bloodshed when there was no immediate need to try to make an arrest.

The majority of lands in the West, those administered by the BLM, Forest Service, and some National Monuments created recently for wholly political purposes, need to be turned over to the States.

And just to put things into perspective, while taking the family on the east coast road trip this last summer I was reminded that most of the National Parks and Monuments back east from Faneuil Hall to Gettysburg to the Smithsonian and the Liberty Bell, are all free. Even the Statute of Liberty up to the pedestal is free once you pay for the ferry ride to the island and going to the crown is only $3 more. Here at home, it costs me $30 for a 7 day pass to drive into Zion National Park to see my mother's childhood home. Under federal law, $24 stays in the park, while the other $6 goes to subsidize parks where fees are not charged. I'm paying not only to visit my own ancestral lands, but also subsidizing free recreation in East Coast NPS venues. Yes, I'm a little galled at that.

So while I don't condone or support the Bundy's conduct, neither would vote for any conviction beyond being stupid.

Sorry to be so wordy. Folks east of the Rockies generally have no idea what federal land use policies are doing here in the West. Too many city slicker transplants even into Western urban areas have no idea.

Charles
 
Last edited:

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
This is the point where sane, rational thinkers ask, "Did the FBI commit MURDER?" and sane, rational federal investigators say, "Why, yes - the FBI DID commit murder!"

Linky

If the Feds thought they were sending a message, this retired USAF Veteran head only, "The Feds have NO integrity. They are NOT trustworthy."
 
Last edited:

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
She also claims there were a lot of vehicles and that numerous lasers were targeted on each of them. It begs the question how any of them survived

Idiot statement ... laser light goes where laser is pointed ... bullets go where barrel is pointed. Not the same.

These guys cannot zero their weapons so what makes one think that they can sight in a laser?
 

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
I am not immune to the plight of citizens living in these western states. I followed the terrorising of the family near Area 51 who had the land they owned since the day of Lincoln stolen by the hands of the Air Force and a criminal judge among other things

In my State of Utah, a land area larger than Rhode Island or Delaware was turned into a National Monument with the stroke of Bill Clinton's pen. He didn't even have the guts to sign the EO here in Utah, but did the deed in Arizona. The second largest reserve of low sulfur coal in the world is now off limits to any development. The town of Escalante may soon become a ghost town. Ditto Tropic. The coal town of Price is being killed with the President's/EPA's extreme environmental rules. The coal fired power plant has been shuttered. A similar fate awaits many other small mining and ranching towns throughout the West as the feds run us off our own land.

Federal SWAT teams are used to raid the homes of peaceful doctors who are suspected of having collected a few pieces of pottery or arrow heads from federal land.

Let's take a look at the law. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution states

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;

Based on this it is safe to say the BLM as well as the FWS have zero right to be dictating as they do. Therefore a citizen has the legal right to defend themselves should these rogue government agents choose to enforce the authority they do not have. I do not advocate breaking the law, I advocate exercising rights we already have, regardless of who says we cannot, simply because they have no right to be refusing to allow us those rights. Utah is yet again a state that permits wide freedoms in defending against criminal behaviour and i'm not going to quote it all. The link is right here


The law is the law. The question is what is defined as law and that rests on the supreme document of our land. The Constitution. Clearly these regulations have no constitutional basis and therefore are not law.
 
Top