We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :)
Please help by posting all issues here.
The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
Benjamin Franklin - “A republic, if you can keep it.”
And the only thing that has a chance of preserving it is the second amendment.
Are we about to repeat the Battle of Athens?
https://misruleoflaw.com/2023/04/06/remember-the-battle-of-athens/
Well Big Dog you do live on the left coast. What I find interesting is why William Kirk of Washington Gun Law not bringing suits against Washington State over some or most of the gun laws as being unconstitutional, especially RCW 9.41.305.
This forum is going on 15 years old in May. And yes lots has changed. Except for a couple of states open carry is pretty well accepted. I think OCDO has grown more into a second amendment rights forum than just being about open carry. I conceal carry more being 74 years old and having some...
It's been 5 1/2 years since Grapeshots passing and not having a moderator. I think we have done quite well without a moderator as such.
I'm hopeful I will see the second amendment totally restored in my lifetime, or close to it. I live in a red state but a lot of work still needs to be done...
This is not the only forum that is slow. Many are slow and many are gone. You would think forums would be busier than ever because of all the wins we are getting in the courts, red state courts that is. We need to be pounding on the blue states. We all need to start filing ethical violations...
This Bob Good?
https://good.house.gov/issue/second-amendment
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=Bob+Good+virgina+guns#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:1ecc8dbc,vid:twvM6cz6WmQ,st:0
Someone has to get that issue before the court. Or actually, someone has to move a court to dismiss the case because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case by citing United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542 (1876) and McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742 (2010).
Policy cannot trump Constitutional Rights, period. She waved that argument. See footnote 3. The preemption law is irrelevant, see footnote 1, conceal carry played no part in the decision. She screwed herself. She was in a public place open to the public. Read Bruen. The library is not a...
That case is virtually useless. She went to court and made a frivolous argument. That is what happens when you rely on an attorney who is going to through you to the wolves.
Her idiot attorney made this ridiculous argument.
What does that have to do with open carry? Well lets look at footnote...
Look, Kalifornia is run by fascists/communists. And no, fascists and communists are not from the far right. It is the complete opposite. For the most part fascists and communists cannot see the forest through the trees. They believe totally in "From each according to his ability, to each...
In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 584 (2008) said:
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen 142 S.Ct. 2111 (June 23, 2022) reaffirms Heller’s holding by stating:
Bruen made clear that Open Carry is protected, but the 9th. Circuit of Appeals could care less. We...