She should take a line from JFK (may not be exact, from memory) and change to fit
If confirmed I will be a Supreme Court Justice who happens to be Catholic; not a Catholic who happens to be a Supreme Court Justice.
I am of the opinion that Rome is the main force behind the movement to disarm the American populace. They learned their lesson during the war called the "Counter-Reformation": the German nobles armed their peasants and fought back, which is why Germany today is mainly Lutheran, while Austria is mainly Catholic. Keep in mind that the religion called "Catholicism" is only a part of the Vatican's operations as a sovereign state which maintains its struggle for imperial domination.
Keep in mind, also, that the Roman Empire never "fell" - it was merely transformed, and is alive and well today. The present nominee is apparently proud of his Jesuit training, which makes sense, because they're a bunch of the smartest guys in the world. But the Jesuits are to Catholicism as the IRA is to Sinn Fein, and this nominee will cement the Catholic majority on the Court (six out of nine).
I would also point out that the states that have the most severe laws against personal defense are also those states with the largest Catholic populations - Maryland, Massachussetts, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, California, and Hawaii. Interesting, too, that these states have some of the highest cost of living indices.
And that Rome has been intent on exploiting the loophole created by an early misinterpretation of the language of the Fourteenth Amendment - "... all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside." As a matter of law, a child's domicile is that of his parents (or either of them). That's an unrebuttable presumption. So a child born anywhere in the world to parents whose legal domicile is, say, El Salvador, is also domiciled in El Salvador. A child physically born in Chicago to illegal aliens from anywhere other than the U.S. is legally "born" in its home state, whether that's Ireland or Venezuala, not in the United States. That child thus is not and cannot be a citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment simply as a matter of its physical place of birth. But shortly after the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, Rome saw its chance to take over the U.S. by an influx of "immigrants" which would someday achieve numerical superiority. People came here from Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Poland, and to a lesser extent, France and Spain. So they did two things: they invented the "melting pot" theory of assimilation, suggesting that it would be a good thing if what we consider traditionally American values and culture can be diluted to the point of insignificance, and assumed a deviant interpretation of "born in the United States", such that the illegal aliens' children would grow up to be voting Catholic citizens.
At this point, I say all this only as a historian and observer - Rome has already taken over and they're now just in the process of integration and consolidation. But keep in mind that Rome's view is that their law is the only real law and that the constitutions of nations are merely "municipal" law that can be ignored as their agenda may require. Gun control is coming and there really isn't a (lawful) thing we can do about it at this point. But this nominee is another step in that direction. Remember Scalia, the "conservative" who said that "sensitive locations" may require gun control regulations, far from "shall not be infringed", the majority opinion said that citizens' rights are "not absolute" and subject to "reasonable regulation".
They will persistently chip away at our Constitution until they get what they want, whether it takes six months or six decades. They mean to exploit our wealth and power as they did France, Italy, Portugal and Spain. None of these nations has ever recovered from having been bled dry ever since the Crusades against the Moslem and Jewish "infidels". We're next (e.g., Kennedy's attempt to retake Cuba; Kennedy's escalation of the war in VietNam, in which we were supporting the Catholic South against the Buddhist/Communist North; why we send all kinds of aid to Haiti - 80% Catholic - and ignore other areas hit by terrible natural disasters, and why we're soft on "refugees" from Central and South America and couldn't care less about the Rohingya).
Unfortunately, Rand Paul appears to be the only true conservative in Congress.