utbagpiper
Banned
So, your comment to Mama stating her commentary was 'completely non sequitur' w/o providing any type of rationale or counter argument is just insolence on your part.
Rationale was provided two sentences down in my post.
again, your comment to CC for ME is rude and disrespectful behaviour, and affront towards that member since you didn't provide any rationale why you didn't understand the poster's commentary.
I asked a question about intent, leaving open the potential there were other options I had failed to consider. Hardly an affront except to those looking to take offense.
also, your comment about moderation shows your extreme contempt towards the site's moderation and as such damagingly undermines the moderator(s) role on this forum.
On this front I'm guilty as he11. Very easy for teacher's pet to claim grossly biased moderation is not contemptible. But this all occurred AFTER you had taken it upon yourself to insult me with your favored form of diminutive address, and then presume to dress me down for what you view as violations of social etiquette. You don't get to use what I did after your post to justify your post.
further, your attempt at an insulting comment 'non savant' regarding my having significant mental disabilities or other personality trait deficiency is actually quite humorous...'non' ~ "not of the kind or class described" used in conjunction w/the word savant actually means "not of the kind or class described" "significant mental disabilities."
Again, you can't use what I did after your post to justify your post.
I'm sorry. Do you find "not savant" offensive? Simply ask and I won't address or refer you that way again...so long as you show me the same courtesy. You'll note, I never use that form of address except in response to your addressing me in a way I have repeatedly made clear to you is offensive to me. If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
Simply put, you hold yourself in very high regard, thinking yourself far smarter than others here, a savant of sorts. You're not. Get over yourself. You routinely presume to "challenge" others, while rarely providing anything of material benefit to advance a discussion. Small men tear down what better me build.
You only ever see "not savant" in return for "mate." Balls in your court.
But as other posts make clear, others fully notice when moderation is blatantly biased. And that hurts forum traffic. That you take advantage of your friendship with the moderator to continue contributing to this problem is rather pathetic.
so charles, utbagpiper, piper, your query post above has been acknowledged, instead of summarily dismissed, and objective evidence provided to show you the rationale for my post to call you out.
Your evidence is weak or would be inadmissible in any court. Your rationale for calling me out, is that I don't adhere to your line of thought on CCing into Costco. Get over it. I obey the law. I'm not obliged to obey every bigoted, private policy in existence.
finally, that you believe a singular, colloquialism word for friend, of camaraderie, greeting, can cause you to lose all self control should cause you real significant concern.
Intent matters. We are not friends, we do not have a friendly relationship. You use the term only because you know it annoys me. Your buddy (another singular, colloquialism word for friend, of camaraderie, greeting) the moderator, allows you to do so with impunity, while penalizing me for returning the favor.
Now, if you'd like to comment on the OP, please do. Otherwise, you're dragging yet another thread off topic.
Last edited: