Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Guam must stand talll on self-defense

  1. #1
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    35,351

    Guam must stand talll on self-defense

    The island's future depends on the capacity for self-defence.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...rump-fire-fury

    So too does the individual.
    Better to not open your mouth and be thought the fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  2. #2
    Accomplished Advocate color of law's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,837
    I'm sure Guam is one of those sensitive places the USSC is talking about.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Fallschirmjäger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,818
    Sending troops to protect an island like Guam is fraught with danger and could affect the stability of the island.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4Wt2EKE1j4
    Last edited by Fallschirmjäger; 08-09-2017 at 11:56 AM. Reason: Corrected Gaum to Guam bekawse I don't speel so good b4 kawfee

  4. #4
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    35,351
    Quote Originally Posted by Fallschirmjäger View Post
    Sending troops to protect an island like Gaum [sic] is fraught with danger and could affect the stability of the island.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4Wt2EKE1j4
    Guam is tipping from the weight of the Gooney Birds.
    Better to not open your mouth and be thought the fool, than to open it and remove all doubt.

    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training.” Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    4,061
    Guam is a major US military installation and has been since we recaptured it during WWII. It is also a full US Territory with its residents enjoying full US Citizenship. Save for the fact that Hawaii had major agricultural contributions to the US economy, while Guam is essentially a welfare state without any meaningful private economy, Guam is in the same status vis-a-vie the United States as was the Territory of Hawaii in the early 1940s.

    Any major attack on Guam would result in significant losses for the US Military if the attack were to be successful. One would hope the lessons of the past have been learned and that early warning systems would at least allow high value aircraft to get airborne before a nuclear missile attack. I doubt moored Navy vessels could get out of the blast zone given a 15 minute or less time of flight for ICBMs from NK.

    It is absolutely offensive and unconstitutional for Guam not to fully respect the individual RKBA guaranteed by the 2nd amendment.

    But all the private firearms in the world won't do a thing to deter a nuclear attack that can be launched from 2000 miles away, and with no intent to invade or occupy. Depending on the type of attack, nuclear blasts could render Guam uninhabitable for decades as happened with the test islands in the Bikini Atoll.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •