...this theme of ignoring property owners rights where their [sic] is signage...
Exactly which signage did you want me to pay attention to and respect in our modern world? Which do you think are worthy of respect?
People are prone to claim a lot of "rights" that I just don't feel compelled to recognize.
I don't recognize any right for a father to engage in an "honor killing" or even genital mutilation of his daughter.
I don't recognize any right to encumber a home with any limitation on selling that home to a black man, Catholic, Jew, etc. I don't care how much both sides of the sale, or even the rest of the neighbors support such private contracts, I don't recognize such contracts as valid. See "violation of public policy" exception.
I don't recognize someone else's claimed "right" to "feel safe", or not to be offended, or other such silly emotional responses.
I don't think the following photo show an exercise of any real "right".
I don't believe in letting the free market solve this issue. I believe the following is half a step removed from deadly assault and is rightfully prohibited and punished by law before anyone gets injured or killed.
We are obliged to obey the law.
We ought to give some thought to how our conduct is going to affect public respect for the real, enumerated, judicially recognized right to keep and bear arms.
But I'm not really interested in sitting at the back of the bus or being denied service at the lunch counter just because my particular minority group has not yet been granted full anti-discrimination protections.
If someone cares enough to install real security, I won't carry. If they care enough to notice my firearm (whether OC'd or CC'd) and ask me to leave, I'll leave. I'm just no longer worried about obscure requests, policies, or even discriminatory signage.
As you noted, I have made my position on this well know. So quit harping on it just because you don't like it. Disagree civilly. Argue rationally, cogently, and maturely if you are able. Or else let it go.
...
finally, per your own by line, as UTAH's leading firearm advocate,
Yet in the
SCOTUS makes a good callthread you had this to say about me:
...
you mean piper's apparently dead website with the last reader feedback dating back to 2007 and the latest dated article 2014? you mean that type of active in helping with no apparent life of late in the website?
And
...
consider providing objective & verifiable statements about the goodness done instead of making subjective and unsubstantiated emotionalized statements about the bravado on accomplishments only to discern they are unsubstantiated bravado and as clint said so nicely...'legends in their own mind' mentality.
for goodness sake...he admits he has a 'date' with his partner and shows up on the last day of legislative session...ya that is a good idea to do glad hand'g on the day everyone goes home...
I have no "by line" so...
Have you changed your view of me and my political activism? Or are you shamelessly shifting your position to whatever makes the most convenient platform from which to attack me personally?
It is well past time to leave your personality issues behind and stick to real issues.
Charles